科研成果 首页 > 科学研究 > 科研成果 > 正文
[SCI]Characteristics of systematic errors in the BDS Hatch-Melbourne-Wubbena combination and its influence on wide-lane ambiguity resolution 时间:2017-03-20

Characteristics of systematic errors in the BDS Hatch-Melbourne-Wubbena combination and its influence on wide-lane ambiguity resolution

作者:Zhang, XH (Zhang, Xiaohong)[ 1,2,3 ] ; He, XY (He, Xiyang)[ 1,2,3 ] ; Liu, WK (Liu, Wanke)[ 1,2,3 ]

GPS SOLUTIONS

卷: 21

期: 1

页: 265-277

DOI: 10.1007/s10291-016-0520-6

出版年: JAN 2017

查看期刊信息

摘要

The Hatch-Melbourne-Wubbena (HMW) combination is a geometry-free and ionospheric-free (first-order) function that has been widely used for cycle slip detection and ambiguity resolution in GNSS dual-frequency data processing. We investigate the characteristics of HMW combinations for BeiDou navigation satellite system (BDS) observations for different types of satellites. We first study the characteristics of BDS undifferenced (UD) HMW combinations. Obvious systematic errors are found on BDS UD HMW combinations. The characteristics of single-differenced (SD) and double-differenced (DD) HMW combinations are then analyzed. The results indicate that the biases do not cancel in single-differencing between two satellites. On the contrary, they are amplified because of the superposition of the systematic biases of two satellite signals. In single-differencing between two receivers, different characteristics are found for different satellites types depending on baseline length. For inclined geostationary orbit (IGSO) and Medium Earth Orbit (MEO), the systematic biases cancel for single-differencing between receivers or double-differencing over short and medium baselines; however, they do not cancel in single-differencing between receivers or double-differencing over long baselines. Regarding geostationary earth orbit (GEO), the systematic biases do not cancel for single-differencing between receivers or double-differencing over both short and long baselines. In addition, we analyze the sources of the systematic biases of the BDS HMW combination. The systematic biases of IGSO and MEO HMW combinations mainly originate from multipath errors at the satellite; the systematic biases of GEO HMW combinations may also originate from multipath errors. Finally, we study the influence of the systematic errors on wide-lane ambiguity resolution by analyzing the consistency of the fractional part of the averaged SD HMW combinations and the fixing rate of DD wide-lane ambiguity resolution. The results are compared with those of GPS.

作者信息

通讯作者地址: Liu, WK (通讯作者)

Wuhan Univ, Sch Geodesy & Geomat, 129 Luoyu Rd, Wuhan 430079, Peoples R China.

通讯作者地址: Liu, WK (通讯作者)

Wuhan Univ, Collaborat Innovat Ctr Geospatial Technol, 129 Luoyu Rd, Wuhan 430079, Peoples R China.

通讯作者地址: Liu, WK (通讯作者)

Minist Educ, Key Lab Geospace Environm & Geodesy, Wuhan, Peoples R China.

地址:

[ 1 ] Wuhan Univ, Sch Geodesy & Geomat, 129 Luoyu Rd, Wuhan 430079, Peoples R China

[ 2 ] Wuhan Univ, Collaborat Innovat Ctr Geospatial Technol, 129 Luoyu Rd, Wuhan 430079, Peoples R China

[ 3 ] Minist Educ, Key Lab Geospace Environm & Geodesy, Wuhan, Peoples R China

电子邮件地址:wkliu@sgg.whu.edu.cn

基金资助致谢

基金资助机构授权号

National Natural Science Foundation of China

41474025

41204030

41304005

Natural Science Foundation for Distinguished Young Scholar of Hubei Province of China

2015CFA039

查看基金资助信息

出版商

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG, TIERGARTENSTRASSE 17, D-69121 HEIDELBERG, GERMANY

类别 / 分类

研究方向:Remote Sensing

Web of Science 类别:Remote Sensing

文献信息

文献类型:Article

语种:English

入藏号: WOS:000392314000023

ISSN: 1080-5370

eISSN: 1521-1886

期刊信息

Impact Factor (影响因子): 2.991